I received my feedback from Mrs. Scott tonight about what things were good/what I need to change about my research proposal.
I agreed with much of what she said. There were some comments she made where I thought to myself, "how did I not see this myself before sending this in?!"
There were some minor errors, such as grammatical ones that can be an easy fix. There were others however, concerning content, what information is in which section and the placement of the sections themselves that I am definitely looking to change after reading over the comments Mrs. Scott wrote out for me.
I'm going to be a lot more specific in my methods section, for one thing. I did not go into very much detail about my "who, what, when, where, how," of each of my proposed methods of doing my research. In addition, I have to write my timetable as if it were in the time frame of 1-2 years and not just one semester.
I have other things I want to improve on in my research proposal and will let you all know how it is going as I'm working more on it!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Yeah, I got a few comments on my methods section too...that seems to be one of the more difficult ones. I guess its not enough to say what you're going to do; you have to include exactly HOW you're going to do it.
I had the same kind of feedback, from the methods section. I remember you were the one to tell me about the listing rather than a paragraph. Ms. Scott said that was a good idea, so thanks!
Post a Comment